Sunday, 26 January 2014

Domestic Abuse (lots of why, but answers?)



So I just saw a report on Sky News that one of their own sports presenters is going to run 250 miles in seven days to raise awareness of domestic abuse and all I can is, bloody well done and the best of luck to her.


But hang on, is that all I can say? Err no.

The cause to which Charlie Webster under takes is admirable and heroic in my opinion, having been a victim of abuse herself, I myself also first hand, this is clearly an issue in society close to our hearts as it should be with everyone; however, it is the constant cause that never seems to be a means to an end. 





What do I mean by that?

Do we really need more “awareness”? Do we really need to keep asking “why”? My answer to that is twofold, obviously awareness and why is always in need of constant replenishment in the minds of us all, but that is simply not going far enough. 

Why? Because we have lots of awareness, lots of people asking why, very few or else no one is providing answers and this is the real issue here. 


It is a very risky thing to say, “I understand why that person raped you!” it’s a very risky thing to say, “I know why that person beat you up at home!” it’s a very risky thing to say, “I understand why that paedophile molested that child!”  It is in fact, social suicide and/or street cred annihilation. 

If I was to say any of the aforementioned statements; immediately, I would be seen as having sympathy for the devil, simply because the word “understand” is anecdotally synonymous with understanding and sympathy as well as care and allowance for the perpetration of these criminal acts. 

And here within lies the problem, what if “understand” was synonymous with science, psychiatry, comprehension of the complexity of individualism and above all else, education.   For example, actor Patrick Stewart, whose father beat up his mother on regular occasions, later discovered that his father had undiagnosed shell shock or the modern equivalent of PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) and now he says he campaigns for both the awareness & stoppage of domestic violence as well as the all important understanding as to the cause of it, but Patrick Stewart is only one man.

It is not good enough to send a perpetrator of violence to anger management classes when they may have, for argument sakes, severe alcohol or drug addiction, undiagnosed psychosis or schizophrenia (when voices convince the patient to abuse) or DID – Dissociative Identity Disorder where the individual’s mind has created a violent personality, or as was the case with Patrick Stewart’s father, undiagnosed PTSD; is anger management or basic counselling really that affective in situations such as this?


Every attacker is as individual as their victims so thus, unless we resist this constant desire to use the paint of generalisation and tar all with the same brush of convenience, we simply will never be able to comprehend the answers to “why” once we have the “awareness”.

Unfortunately, it is a social ill in the mindset of society that the “awareness” and the “why” is acceptable but the understanding of it, is seen as unethical thus written into law as well as the cut backs, the lack of science and the embellishment into the psyche of the many that “understanding” in these cases is a facade to evil; it simply isn’t, and here within is a real problem.




Don’t get me wrong, under no circumstances does this go in any way a direction of excusing domestic violence or abuse of any kind; it is a violent act, due process must take place and it must stop, but it won’t unless we answer these questions.
   
So thus, I truly feel that we need to enter a very uncomfortable and new dimension of thinking to ever truly answer the question, “why” and to ever bring about real awareness and real change by tackling the psychological determinants of abuse, the mindset of perpetrators and the ultimate goal of all the aforementioned as a coming about of social healing in the way of, a cure, imagine that? Would be nice wouldn’t it?

Thank you for reading

VisionGhost

Friday, 13 December 2013

Hard Worker vs The Spoiled




I am 34 years old, have 12 years sales experience, live in relatively comfortable surrounds, am I in a stable relationship and can just about get by; however, it wasn’t always this way. I didn’t have the upbringing most people would deem as orthodox, I never made it at college, didn’t go on to university or get a degree and my home life was hellish, with undiagnosed Aspergers’ plus depression and a dependence on alcohol to get by just to rub it in somewhat.

My parents, whom I am no longer in contact with (good) were less than sympathetic to my plight but somehow I bumbled on through life drifting from job to job but always getting by, surviving, this survival that has taught me a massive number of even bigger lessons in life to the extent I believe my mindset to be that of a degree of wisdom that money for education just can’t buy.


So how come I’m not a Managing Director of some multi-national conglomerate firm? Why do I not drive around in a top of the range Lexus or BMW? Why do I not live in the house with 2 bathrooms, 6 bedrooms and a crystal chandelier in every room?
Why do the ones who are 15 years young than me destined to have all the above, in about ten years from now who never ever lived through what I did?

The answer to that last question lies in the mindset of the modern way of industry, that it seemingly is a vision of the future that the Millennial Generation Y vs X widens the gap between us ever more; that if you developed within a very fortunate environment, had lots of money, education was paid for and supported unerringly, degree under the belt via unparalleled encouragement and now drive around d in a nice car that Mummy & Daddy paid for, then your guaranteed to go everywhere in life as employers will snap you up in seconds and why? Because they love you because you were loved and spoiled, had your ass wiped and everything else done for you.

So what about people like me? People like me whom have had to work at it that little bit harder, had a shed load less and had to find a way, people like me who had to labour for hours of a day to make ends meet and to prove we are worth it, yet even now are seen as less despite conquering brick wall challenges in life. 

For example, recently I had a job which was good money in my books, but I got over-enthusiastic, admitted I had Aspergers, told of some of the difficulties I've faced in life and tried install some wisdom I'd learnt over the years; just ten weeks in and two days later after that fateful admittance, I was fired. When I got my reference they had lied saying it was a short term contract and in this "glowing reference" that they promised there was no mention of all the hard work, all the ideas I had, the 12-13 hour days, giving up my weekends at no extra pay to try and make a difference, nothing!

Over the years I’ve noticed a steady trend in the mindset of human kind, that if you had it all at the start you’ll have a much greater guarantee to have it all throughout your life despite being so ignorant of the way of that life and more than likely, a darn site lazier. 

Go here to back up what I am saying...


Generations ago, age and years of hard laboured work was seen as a congressional medal of honour, nowadays, it seems you do less and get more, assuming your below the age of 25 and have had a third party to wipe your ass for you.  


I feel that in the interview, on the CV, in the face of opportunity, I am seen as a second rate citizen because I got off on a bad start which wasn’t my fault but I fought through it, which seemingly in the eyes of most I am the unorthodox human being that no one has time for in terms of employment and advancement. It is wrong, it is prejudice and people like us to have to again try harder and harder to be recognised.

Go here and you’ll see what I mean...


I must say I feel bloody sorry for the elder generation and the people whom can identify with what I am saying; Maybe we should all standout on the street’s and wave our placards and body boards with the statement of our lives printed on it for all to see; is this really the world we live in that the “have alls” are seen and treated like royalty yet the “Have Less Work Harder’s” are seen as second rate and never given the chance? The gap widens ever further. 


This isn’t about the gap between rich and poor, this is the gap between fortune and misfortune, love and the loveless, laboured hard-working vs the already fortunate lazy, those who go with the herd vs those who face mental health conditions, those that have it so easy vs those who have to try that bit harder and so it goes on...

We all know there is no such thing as an “equal opportunities employer” but when we are faced with the idea that hard work and survival takes second place to spoiled brats and the beautiful rich, then, we all can conclude we have a serious social and economic problem that’s getting worse, every single day!

Thank you for reading

VisionGhost  

Saturday, 16 November 2013

A Loose Theory about Alien Abduction



Introduction:

If there is one thing I certainly do believe in, is that life most certainly with all probability does exist in worlds other than our own; many a persons’ eyes will glaze over or roll to the heavens, denial and laughter ensues but I believe this to be the truth.
Now, before I even get started bear in mind the side of the brain I think from; the right side, the creative side so thus, I can draw up a convincing concept but unable to exact the math to back it up in any real time logic; however, sometimes we don’t always solve enquiries with numbers.

Firstly it is wise to anoint exactly what we assume an Alien Abduction is; simply put it is the unwilling taking of a human being or animal by entities not terrestrial to Earth either to be taken aboard a craft or to another place; typically in these circumstances persons or animals are returned to the exact location or nearby from where they were originally taken, with often nothing much more than confusion for a memory of the past events.  Often persons who recover more vivid memories of the event describe a triangular craft, very little if no sound at all then being brought aboard said craft and being experimented on, sometimes leaving bizarre scarring which cannot be explained.

Last night I watched a documentary on this subject and my mind was aghast with theories after it was announced that for a craft, even with our own technology would take millions of years to cross the galaxy to get to Earth; now yes we can assume that we only base this hypothesis on that fact we simply don’t know what technology extra terrestrial aliens use, however, here’s my theory of how it’s done. 

Hypothesis:

What if there is in fact very little “travel” involved at all?  I am not assuming that ET-As (Extra Terrestrial Aliens) are here already, I think they very much live in their own world for the best part of the time; however, assuming we’re right and they cannot travel the billions of light years from one world to our own it is however, theorised that ET-As can originate from an ulterior-dimension; possibly closer to our own then we may be aware of.

It is my theory that this “craft” people claim to have seen by those who have experienced an abduction are in fact not spacecrafts at all, but essentially a window, a moving breach between one dimension and the other; allowing ET-As to simply infiltrate our own world without even having left their own or at least not from any substantial distance. 


And here’s how:

Essentially I think the “craft” is, if you may lend your mind to this, an inter-dimensional zipper. We all know that the connective tissue of atoms is the Higgs Boson particle; or the God Particle as they say, the one particle that links all other atoms together to enact mass; my theory is that the “craft” simply unties the bond between mass of our world and that of their own creating a gap in space and time; similar to that of a window, allowing penetrative infiltration from one world to the next.  

So how does that work:

As I described, the “craft” is simply a zipper, pulling apart the Higgs Boson particles from all adjoining atoms untying mass to open up the gap of what would be then, not nothingness but a stabilised scattering of mass particles opening up the barrier for the “craft” to fit within. The shape of the “craft” or UFO gives me some thought that if you unzip something from the front, then you are left with sides at the back, hence you unzip a jacket, there are now two sides, so thus, the triangular shape commonly seen would indicate to me that the zip is reformed at the back of the UFO automatically as it “travels”. 


So why can’t we see the re-zip:

Here’s something that did leave me stumped for a moment until I started thinking about “lost time” and how the surgical scars abductees witnessed always seem old or in an advanced stage of healing, having only lost typically 45-60 minutes of their own time. It is my thinking that then in the ET-As dimensional time is considerably more accelerated then our own; so thus, when the window is opened we are peering into a point of time that is their own at the front of the “craft”. Then at the rear the two points are re-zipped but back into our time frame and thus, is in the past and we can’t see it as cannot see into the past rendering the re-zip invisible.

Why the lost time:

Simply enough as I mentioned before, my thinking is that time is accelerated in their dimension and slower in our own; come on, think about it, how else could you perform a complex abduction, surgical procedures and then returning of the abductees in less than an hour or so with surgical scars seemingly already in an advanced stage of healing; within their time zone we cannot fathom motion and memory quick enough to place within our minds a conceivable memory rendering any real witness statement inconclusive because of the fragmented nature of the recalling of the moment. This may in itself lend as to why these procedures could be done so quickly and how we cannot move to get away; because we’re then too slow; abductees stay within our own time zone while the ET-As remain in theirs. It would be only way such a feat could be achieved in such a short space of our time.  It would also being me to something else I observed with the “craft” that it seldom stops moving.  


Why:

Simply because, if time between one dimension and the other is imbalanced then one mass would be stretched to the relativity of the other, hence the window must keep moving to essentially abridge one time frame to the other; now yes, on occasion it has been witnessed that the “craft” stays still, this is true, but what then happens, the “craft” literally zips off in any one direction so fast that it can’t be tracked by the human eye and I would theorise that the two shifts in time are to some extent elasticised, so thus, when the “craft” stays still in one dimension it is being stretched by the other until it cannot hold out and is violently hurtled back into the present and accompanying time frame of its own home dimension restoring the balance of the two points. 


So thus I conclude that if it were possible for ET-As to visit Earth it would have to be inter-dimensional and with the utilisation of the re-organisation of mass by repealing particles unzipping space and time relative to their dimension and our own. It would take I imagine a huge amount of power to do that; as to where this power is derived is almost impossible to articulate; however, possibly harvested neutrino energy? Something we’re been trying to do for years now!

Thank you for reading.

VisionGhost